青藏高原及其周围地区区域应力场与构造运动特征
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2003CB716505);国家自然科学基金项目(40399141)和国土资源部中国岩石圈三维结构专项计划项目(200010103)资助。


Characteristics of the regional stress field and tectonic movement on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and in its surrounding areas
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    提要:本文系统解析并分析了1931年8月-2005年10月期间青藏高原及其周围发生的905个震级M4.5~8.5地震的震源机制结果,研究了青藏高原岩石圈的区域应力场与构造运动特征。结果表明,来自印度板块的北北东或北东方向的水平挤压应力控制了青藏高原及其周缘地区的岩石圈应力场。从喜马拉雅到贝加尔湖以南包括中国西部的广大范围内,主压应力P轴的水平分量位于近NE-SW方向,形成了一个广域的NE-SW方向的挤压应力场。特别是青藏高原周缘地区,除其东部边缘外,南部的喜马拉雅山前沿以及青藏高原的北部、西部边缘地区所发生的绝大部分地震都属于逆断层型或走滑逆断层型地震,表现出周缘地区的水平挤压应力更为强势。应力场特征充分表明,印度板块的北上运动,以及它与欧亚板块之间的碰撞,所形成的挤压应力场是青藏高原强烈隆起的直接原因。在青藏高原周缘地区受到强烈挤压应力场控制的同时,有大量正断层型地震集中发生在青藏高原中部海拔4 000 m以上的地区,其中许多地震是纯正断层型地震。震源机制结果显示,近E-W向 或 WNW-ESE向的水平扩张应力控制着该区的岩石圈应力场;正断层型地震的断层走向多为南北方向,断层位错矢量的水平分量大体位于近东西方向。这表明青藏高原中部高海拔地区存在着近东西方向的扩张构造运动,且扩张构造运动是该区引张应力场的作用结果。其动力学原因可能与持续隆升的高原自重增大引起的重力崩塌及其周边区域构造应力状况有关。研究青藏高原存在挤压应力场与引张应力场及其构造运动的区域特征,对于认识青藏高原形成、发展的地球动力学机制, 有着极其重要的意义。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:The authors systematically analyzed the focal mechanism solutions of 905 earthquakes (M4.6-8.5) that occurred in and around the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau between 1931 and 2005 and studied the characteristics of the regional stress field and tectonic movement of the lithosphere below the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The results show that the NNE or NE horizontal compressional stress due to the northward movement of the Indian plate predominates the tectonic stress fields in and around the study region. The horizontal components of the principal compressional stress P axes are oriented in a nearly NE-SW direction, forming a wide NE-SW compressional stress field in a wide areal extent from the Himalayas to south of Baikal Lake, including western China. Especially in the surrounding areas of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, earthquakes caused by reverse and strike-slip faulting are predominant in the Himalayan Mountain front on the southern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and on the northern and western margins of the plateau, except the eastern margin. It implies that a strong horizontal compressional stress exists around the plateau. The characteristics of the stress field show that the direct cause of the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is due to the compressional stress field formed by the northward movement of the Indian plate and India-Eurasia collision. Many normal fault type earthquakes are concentrated in areas with elevations of >4000 m above sea level on the central Qinghai-Tibet Plateau while the surrounding areas of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau are subjected to the control of the strong compressional stress field. Of these, many earthquakes are pure normal fault type ones. Their focal mechanism solutions show that the nearly E-W or WNW-ESE horizontal tensional stress controls the lithospheric stress field in the region. The normal fault type earthquake faults mostly strike N-S and the horizontal component of the displacement vectors of the faults is largely oriented in a nearly E-W direction. This indicates that a nearly E-W extensional movement exists in areas with a high altitude in the central part of the plateau and that the extensional movement is the result of the action of the tensional stress field. The dynamics for the extensional movement may be attributed to the gravitational collapse caused by the increasing load of the continuously rising plateau and the regional stress of its surroundings. The study of the regional characteristics of the compressional and extensional stress fields and their tectonic movement on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau has very great significance for understanding the geodynamic mechanisms of the formation and development of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐纪人 赵志新. 青藏高原及其周围地区区域应力场与构造运动特征[J]. 中国地质, 2006, 33(2): 275-285.
XU Ji-ren, ZHAO Zhi-xin. Characteristics of the regional stress field and tectonic movement on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and in its surrounding areas[J]. Geology in China, 2006, 33(2): 275-285(in Chinese with English abstract).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2013-04-11
  • 出版日期:
亮点文章推荐
古人云:工欲善其事,必先利其器。我国新一轮战略找矿行动已全面启动。用什么方法、什么手段实现增储上产是面临的突出问题。本刊登载了几篇基于新技术、新方法实现找矿突破的实例,供大家参阅,助力新一轮战略找矿目标的实现。
基于随机森林算法的找矿预测——以冈底斯成矿带西段斑岩—浅成低温热液型铜多金属矿为例. 欧阳渊等,2023, 50(2):303-330.
基于重磁资料在山东齐河—禹城探获矽卡岩型富铁矿:对超深覆盖区找矿的启示. 王润生等,2023, 50(2):331-346.
自然伽马曲线重构波阻抗反演在勘探含铀有利成矿砂体中的尝试. 梁建刚等,2023, 50(2):347-358.
宽频大地电磁法寻找“界面型”隐伏金矿床:以黔西南戈塘地区深部找矿为例. 张伟等,2023, 50(2):359-375.
页岩气基础地质调查钻井技术研究进展及展望. 赵洪波等,2023, 50(2):376-394.
关闭