高级检索

    中全新世以来连云港滨海地区沉积物碳埋藏通量及来源解析

    Analysis of carbon burial flux and source in coastal sediments of Lianyungang since the Mid−Holocene

    • 摘要:
      研究目的 海岸带及陆架区碳埋藏影响因素及其驱动机制是全球的研究热点之一,以往的研究一般局限于土壤总有机碳(TOC)的单孔研究,较少进行总碳(TC)与TOC的系统研究, 本文对连云港中全新世以来沉积物碳埋藏及保存影响因素进行了系统研究,可以为评价区域碳储能力服务。
      研究方法 通过对连云港滨海地区中全新世以来沉积物TOC、TC、TN(总氮) 含量及δ13C的测定,结合AMS14C测年、X衍射、易溶盐、有孔虫、粒度、密度、比重、含水率等数据,分析了连云港滨海地区碳埋藏的时空分布特征、碳来源及碳埋藏的主要影响因素。
      研究结果 采用历史地理学结合14C测年数据进行了年代地层划分,分为三个沉积阶段:阶段Ⅰ 为6325~722 a BP期间,为陆架沉积环境,TOCBF(TOC埋藏通量)平均值为8.1 g /(m2·a),TCBF(TC埋藏通量)平均值为24.9 g /(m2·a)。阶段Ⅱ 为722~205 a BP期间,为滨海陆架−海滨海环境,TOCBF平均值为57.00 g /(m2·a),TCBF平均值为271.8 g /(m2·a)。阶段Ⅲ 为205~0 a BP期间,为潮间带环境,TOCBF、TCBF数值与阶段Ⅱ 相当。阶段Ⅰ 的沉积物TOC虽较阶段Ⅱ、Ⅲ含量稍高,但阶段Ⅱ、Ⅲ受黄河夺淮后物源补给的影响,沉积速率增长了5~9倍, TCBF与TOCBF分别增长了8倍及11倍。
      结论 沉积物TC含量主要受到东亚强季风控制的现代环流影响,TC主要有无机碳组成,平均占比约70%,最高占比达84%。在6325~3000 a BP期间TC含量较低,或与在此期间强烈的东亚强季风有关,此阶段平均粒径数值也较其他沉积阶段大。TOC来源主要为海源,约占67%,陆源占比约33%。浅表TOC数值较高,这与浅表有TOC藏时间较短,部分TOC尚未完全矿化分解以及人类活动影响有关。

       

      Abstract:
      This paper is the result of environmental geological survey engineering.
      Objective The influencing factors and driving mechanism of carbon burial in coastal zones and shelf areas are one of the global research hotspots. Previous researches are generally limited to single−hole studies of total organic carbon (TOC), and systematic study of total carbon (TC) and TOC are rarely conducted. This article systematically studies the factors affecting the carbon burial and preservation of sediments in Lianyungang since the Middle Holocene, which can serve to evaluate the regional carbon storage capacity.
      Methods Through the determination of TOC, TC, and TN (total nitrogen) δ13C content of sediments, combined with AMS14C dating, X−ray diffraction, soluble salt, foraminifera and particle size data since the Mid-Holocene, the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of carbon burial, carbon sources and the main influencing factors of carbon burial were analyzed in the coastal area of Lianyungang.
      Results A chronostratigraphic classification was carried out using historical geography combined with AMS14C dating data, which was divided into three depositional stages: Stage I is 6325−722 a BP period, it is a shelf sedimentary environment, TOCBF (TOC burial flux) average value is 8.1 g /(m2·a), the average value of TCBF (TC burial flux) is 24.9 g /(m2·a). Stage II is the coastal shelf−near coastal environment during 722−205 a BP, with an average TOCBF of 57.0 g /(m2·a) the average value of TCBF is 271.8 g /(m2·a). Stage Ⅲ is an offshore-intertidal environment during 205−0 a BP. The values of TOCBF and TCBF are equivalent to those of stage Ⅱ. Although TOC content of the sediments in stage Ⅰ is slightly higher than that in stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ, the deposition rate of stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ is affected by the source replenishment after the Yellow River captures Huaihe River, and the deposition rate has increased by 5−9 times, so TCBF and TOCBF have increased by 8−11 times.
      Conclusions TC content of sediment is mainly influenced by the modern circulation controlled by the strong East Asian monsoon, and TC is mainly composed of inorganic carbon with an average share of about 70% and a maximum of 84%. During the period of 6325−3000 a BP, TC content was low, or it was related to the strong East Asian monsoon during this period. The mean grain size values at this stage were also larger than that of other sedimentary stages. The source of TOC is mainly from marine sources, accounting for about 67%. The superficial TOC value is higher, which is related to the short storage time of superficial TOC, part of TOC has not been completely mineralized and decomposed, and the impact of human activities.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回