高级检索

    全球CO2地质封存类型、案例与启示

    Types, cases and enlightenment of global geological carbon dioxide sequestration

    • 摘要:
      研究目的 CO2封存已经成为应对气候变化等一系列环境问题的关键战略,对于减少CO2排放这个全球性问题,CO2地质封存是重要“兜底”技术手段,也被认为是管理碳足迹的新范式。但CO2地质封存有关概念、范畴、技术、挑战和未来等方面认知碎片化,缺乏系统把控。
      研究方法 本文综述了目前关于CO2地质封存的原理,对6类封存体介质和每种封存体的应用实例进行了系统概述,分析了CO2地质封存潜在的风险,并进行了前景展望。
      研究结果 适合CO2地质封存的构造包括咸水含水层、废弃油气藏、不可开采煤层、玄武岩、CO2水合物和盐穴。每种方法都有其独特的优势,储存深度对于保持CO2的密度至关重要,从而增强储存能力和安全性。目前可能诱发地震、威胁环境和成本过高是CO2地质封存面临的主要挑战。
      结论 深部咸水层与废弃油气藏是当前最具规模化实施条件的CO2地质封存路径,不可开采煤层、玄武岩、CO2水合物与盐穴封存是未来重点方向。技术突破重点聚焦断层、地震、环境影响的安全性评价以及低成本、高效率、长尺度、多场景的CO2监测技术。

       

      Abstract:
      This paper is the result of environmental geological survey engineering.
      Objective Carbon sequestration has emerged as a crucial strategy in addressing a series of environmental issues, particularly climate change. For the global challenge of reducing carbon emissions, geological sequestration of CO2 serves as a vital "backstop" technology and is considered a new paradigm for managing carbon footprints. However, there is a fragmented understanding of the concepts, scopes, technologies, challenges, and future prospects of geological carbon sequestration, lacking a systematic approach.
      Methods This paper comprehensively reviews the current principles of geological carbon sequestration, providing a systematic overview of six types of storage media and application cases for each sequestration body. It also analyzes the potential risks associated with geological carbon sequestration and offers a prospective outlook.
      Results The geological formations that are viable for CO2 sequestration encompass saline aquifers, depleted oil and gas fields, unviable coal seams, basalt formations, CO2 hydrates, and salt caverns. Each of these approaches boasts distinct advantages, with depth playing a pivotal role in preserving CO2 density, subsequently bolstering both sequestration capacity and safety. Nevertheless, geological carbon sequestration confronts several primary obstacles: the risk of induced earthquakes, potential environmental hazards, and substantial costs.
      Conclusions Deep saline aquifers and depleted oil and gas reservoirs are currently the most scalable pathways for CO2 geological storage, while unmineable coal seams, basalt formations, CO2 hydrate trapping, and salt cavern storage represent key future directions. Technological breakthroughs should focus on safety assessments related to faults, seismic activity, and environmental impacts, as well as the development of low-cost, high-efficiency, long-term, and multi-scenario CO2 monitoring technologies.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回