高级检索

    基于MSPA及重力模型的大兴安岭地区生态安全格局构建

    Construction of ecological security pattern in the Daxing'anling Region based on MSPA and the Gravity Model

    • 摘要:
      研究目的 生态安全格局构建是区域经济发展协调与自然资源环境保护实现双赢的重要途径之一。大兴安岭作为国家大粮仓松嫩平原的天然生态屏障,是国家实现“双碳”战略目标的重要储备基地,构建大兴安岭地区生态安全格局对于缓解区域生态安全与城镇建设、社会经济发展矛盾具有重要现实意义。
      研究方法 以黑龙江省大兴安岭地区为研究对象,采用形态学空间格局分析(MSPA)方法,提取出对研究区生态网络构建具有重要生态意义的核心区和桥接区两类景观要素,选用整体连通性(IIC)、可能连通性(PC)和斑块重要性(dPC)等景观指数,分别对核心区和桥接区进行景观连接度评价,筛选出景观连通性较高的生态源地斑块,基于最小累积阻力模型(MCR)和重力模型(GM),提取生态廊道及生态节点,结合用地类型共同构建了大兴安岭地区生态安全格局。
      研究结果 大兴安岭地区识别出重要生态源地34个,中等生态源地1个,一般生态源地2个,提取一级廊道40条,二级廊道26条,三级廊道600条,识别生态节点222个,共同构成了大兴安岭地区以生态源地为中心的生态安全格局。
      结论 大兴安岭地区生态安全格局的构建为区域生态系统服务功能优化和可持续发展相关政策的制定提供参考与依据,为其他区域生态安全网络的构建提供借鉴。

       

      Abstract:
      This paper is the result of ecological geological survey engineering.
      Objective The construction of an ecological security pattern serves as a critical pathway to achieving a win–win scenario between regional economic development coordination and natural resource and environmental protection. As the natural ecological barrier for the Songnen Plain—a major national grain production base—the Greater Khingan Mountains represent a significant strategic reserve for China's "Dual Carbon" goals. Establishing an ecological security pattern in the Daxing’anling region is of great practical importance for mitigating conflicts between regional ecological security and urban development, as well as socioeconomic growth.
      Method Focusing on the the Daxing’anling region in Heilongjiang Province, this study employed morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) to identify two key landscape elements critical for constructing an ecological network: core areas and bridge areas. Landscape connectivity was evaluated using indices such as the integral index of connectivity (IIC), probability of connectivity (PC), and patch importance (dPC). Ecological source patches with high connectivity were selected based on these assessments. Utilizing the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model and the gravity model (GM), ecological corridors and nodes were extracted. Combined with land use types, these elements formed the ecological security pattern of the Daxing’anling region.
      Results The study identified 34 important ecological sources, 1 moderate ecological source and 2 general ecological sources in the Daxing’anling region. A total of 40 first-level corridors, 26 secondary corridors and 600 third-level corridors were extracted, along with 222 ecological nodes. Together, these components constitute an ecological security pattern centered on ecological sources in the region.
      Conclusion The construction of the ecological security pattern in the Daxing’anling region provides a reference and basis for formulating policies related to optimizing ecosystem services and promoting sustainable development. It also offers insights for constructing ecological security networks in other regions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回