Correlation of soil salt ions and sampling densities in Tianjin coastal area
-
摘要: 土壤盐渍化是一个世界性的生态问题。天津滨海地区土壤长期遭受海水及高矿化潜水共同作用,土壤盐渍化现象分布广泛。本文选取天津滨海新区太平镇作为典型地区,研究了土壤主要盐分离子的相关性,另外对工作区采样点进行了随机均匀抽稀试验,探讨了不同采样密度对土壤盐渍化插值结果和评价结果的影响。研究表明:天津滨海地区土壤易溶盐中Na+、Cl-所占比例具有绝对优势;土壤中全Cl、Cl-与全盐量具有非常好的相关性,随机均匀抽取少量样本加测全盐量,建立全Cl与全盐量的相关方程可以比较准确地推算出所有样本的全盐量;大密度采样有利于提高样本的代表性,若要满足相对误差合格率≥80%的要求,采样密度不应低于4点/km2,另外用于评价盐渍化等级的采样密度不宜低于1点/km2。Abstract: Soil salinization is a worldwide ecological problem. In Tianjin coastal area, soil has long suffered from sea water and high mineralization diving, so salinization is widely distributed. Choosing Taiping Town of Tianjin coastal area as a typical soil salinization coastal area, the authors determined the correlation between main salt ions in the soil, carried out the random uniform thinning test for sampling points in the study area, and discussed the influence of different sampling densities on the interpolation results and the evaluation results of soil salinization. The results show that the farmland soil in Tianjin coastal area has mainly anions of Cl-, and cations of Na+, and that the total Cl and Cl- have good correlation with total salt in the soil. The authors extracted randomly a small number of samples to test total salt, and established an equation of total Cl and total salt, which could accurately calculate the total salt values for the whole samples. High-density sampling can improve the representation of the samples: when the sampling density is more than 4 points per square kilometers, the acceptance rate of the relative error is equal or greater than 80%; in addition, sampling density of evaluating salinization levels should not be less than 1 points per square kilometers.
-
-
![]()
图 土壤全Cl与易溶盐Cl-含量散点图
图4 Figure The content scatter diagram of soil total Cl and soluble salt Cl-
Fig.4 ![]()
图 抽稀试验中土壤全Cl与全盐量含量的散点图
图5 Figure The content scatter diagram of soil total Cl and total salt content in thinning test
Fig.5 ![]()
图 不同采样密度RE分散度统计
图6 Figure Statistics of RE dispersions in different sampling densities
Fig.6 ![]()
图 不同采样密度RE合格率变化图
图7 Figure The chart of RE acceptance rate in different sampling densities
Fig.7 ![]()
图 各采样密度下样点分布及盐渍化评价图
图8 Figure The chart of sample distribution and salinization evaluation in different sampling densities
Fig.8 不同采样密度全盐量变异系数统计
Statistics of variation coefficients of total salinities in different sampling densities
下载: 导出CSV
不同采样密度各盐渍化等级面积的相对误差
The relative errors of the salinization level area in different sampling densities
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Ghassemi F, Iakeman A J, Nix H A. Salinisation of land and water resources: Human causes, extent, management and case studies[M]. Canberra: UNSW Press, 1995: 1-3.
[2] 杨劲松. 中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 837-845. Yang Jingsong. Development and prospect of the research on saltaffected soils in China [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5): 837-845(in Chinese with English abstract). [3] 王卫星, 李攻科, 侯佳渝, 等. 天津滨海地区土壤剖面盐渍化特征及其影响因素[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(1): 172-179. Wang Weixing, Li Gongke, Hou Jiayu, et al. Salinization characteristics of soil profile in coastal areas of Tianjin and its affecting factors [J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015, 39(1): 172-179(in Chinese with English abstract). [4] 张征云, 孙贻超, 孙静. 天津市土壤盐渍化现状与敏感性评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2006, 25(4): 954-957. Zhang Zhengyun, Sun Yichao, Sun Jing, et al. GIS-based assessment on sensitivity to soil salinization in Tianjin [J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2006, 25(4): 954-957(in Chinese with English abstract). [5] 廉晓娟, 李明悦, 王艳. 基于GIS 的天津滨海新区土壤盐渍化空间分布研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(5): 2746-2748, 2751. Lian Xiaojuan, Li Mingyue, Wang Yan, et al. Study on spatial distribution of soil salinization based on GIS in Tianjin Binhai New Area [J]. Journal of Anhui Agri. Sci., 2012, 40(5): 2746-2748, 2751(in Chinese with English abstract). [6] 奚小环. 生态地球化学: 从调查实践到应用理论的系统工程[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(5): 1-8. Xi Xiaohuan. Ecological geochemistry: from a geochemical survey to an applied theory[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(5): 001-008(in Chinese with English abstract). [7] 王存龙, 曾宪东, 刘华峰, 等. 烟台市土壤环境质量现状及重金属元素分布迁移规律[J]. 中国地质, 2015, 42(1): 317-330. Wang Cunlong, Zeng Xiandong, Liu Huafeng, et al. The present situation of soil environmental quality and the distribution and migration regularity of heavy metals in soil of Yantai[J]. Geology in China, 2015, 42(1): 317-330(in Chinese with English abstract). [8] 简中华, 王世新, 黄春雷, 等. 不同采样密度的土地质量地球化学评估结果对比-以浙江省龙游县为例[J]. 现代地质, 2011, 25 (1): 176-181. Jian Zhonghua, Wang Shixin, Huang Chunlei, et al. Contrast of land quality geochemistry appraisal result in different sampling density: Taking Longyou County of Zhejiang Province as an example[J]. Geoscience, 2011, 25(1): 176-181(in Chinese with English abstract). [9] 陈光, 贺立源, 詹向雯. 耕地养分空间插值技术与合理采样密度的比较研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2008, 39(5): 1007-1011. 表5不同采样密度各盐渍化等级面积的相对误差 Table 4 The relative errors of the salinization level area in different sampling densities 第43卷第2 期李攻科等:天津滨海土壤盐分离子相关性及采样密度研究669 Chen Guang, He Liyuan, Zhan Xiangwen. Comparison of spatial interpolation technique of soil nutrient and reasonable sampling density [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2008, 39(5): 1007-1011(in Chinese with English abstract). [10] 孙韧, 张文具, 董海燕, 等. 2001-2012 年天津市大气降水特征及化学成分分析[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2014, 36(8): 53-58. Sun Ren, Zhang Wenju, Dong Haiyan, et al. Atmospheric precipitation feature of Tianjin from 2001-2012 and its chemical components analysis [J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2014, 36(8): 53-58(in Chinese with English abstract). [11] 闻秀明. 天津市大地构造单元划分[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2011 (1): 29-33. Wen Xiuming. Geotectonic unit division of Tianjin City[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2011(1): 29-33(in Chinese with English abstract). [12] 宋泽峰, 蔡奎, 冯星, 等. 冀中南平原土壤碘地球化学特征研究[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(6): 2144-2151. Song Zefeng, Cai Kui, Feng Xing, et al. Iodine geochemistry studies of soil in central south Hebei Plain[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41(6): 2144-2151(in Chinese with English abstract). [13] 天津市地质矿产局. 天津市地质环境图集[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2004: 13-144. Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration of Tianjin City. Geological Environment Atlas of Tianjin City[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2004: 13-144(in Chinese). [14] 管后春, 李运怀, 彭苗芝, 等. 黄山城市土壤重金属污染及其潜在生态风险评价[J]. 中国地质, 2013, 40(6): 1949-1958. Guan Houchun, Li Yunhuai, Peng Miaozhi, et al. The evaluation of heavy metal pollution and its potential ecological risk of urban topsoil in Huangshan City[J]. Geology in China, 2013, 40(6): 1949-1958(in Chinese with English abstract). [15] 王文俊. 福建省寿宁县1:25万土地质量地球化学评估[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(2): 665-674. Wang Wenjun. 1:250000 land quality geochemical assessment of Shouning County, Fujian Province[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41 (2): 665-674(in Chinese with English abstract). [16] 代杰瑞, 祝德成, 庞绪贵, 等. 济南市土壤元素地球化学特征及环境质量[J]. 中国地质, 2015, 42(1): 308-316. Dai Jierui, Zhu Decheng, Pang Xugui, et al. Geochemical characteristics and environmental quality of soil elements in Jinan City[J]. Geology in China, 2015, 42(1): 308-316(in Chinese with English abstract). [17] 郭全恩, 王益权, 郭天文, 等. 半干旱盐渍化地区果园土壤盐分离子相关性研究[J]. 土壤, 2009, 41 (4): 664-669. Guo Quan'en, Wang Yiquan, Guo Tianwen, et al. Correlation of soil salt ions in orchard in semiarid saline regions [J]. Soils, 2009, 41 (4): 664-669(in Chinese with English abstract). [18] 刘景双, 朱颜明, 黄锡畴, 等. 长白山岳桦林化学元素生物地球化学分析[J]. 地理科学, 1998, 18(5): 457-462. Liu Jingshuang, Zhu Yanming, Huang Xichou, et al. Analysis of biological geochemistry of chemical elements in Betula ermanii forest, Changbai Mountains [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1998, 18(5): 457-462(in Chinese with English abstract). [19] 涂书新, 郭智芬, 孙锦荷. 土壤氯研究的进展[J]. 土壤, 1998, (3): 125-130. Tu Shuxin, Guo Zhifen, Sun Jinhe. Research progress of Cl in soil [J]. Soils, 1998, (3): 125-130(in Chinese). [20] 程道全, 巫振富, 刘晓冰, 等. 样点密度对土壤有机质空间预测结果的影响-以河南封丘县土壤为例[J]. 土壤通报, 2013, 44 (4): 844-850. Cheng Daoquan, Wu Zhenfu, Liu Xiaobing, et al. Influences of sample density on spatial prediction of soil organic matter content: A case study from Fengqiu County, Henan Province [J], Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 44(4): 844-850(in Chinese with English abstract). [21] 刘姗姗, 许迪, 白美健, 等. 考虑入渗空间分布变异性的适宜土壤紧实度采样密度分析[J]. 水利学报, 2015, 46(3): 307-314. Liu Shanshan, Xu Di, Bai Meijian, et al. Analysis of sampling density for suitable soil compaction considering spatial variability of soil infiltration [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015, 46 (3): 307-314(in Chinese with English abstract). [22] 史文娇, 岳天祥, 石晓丽, 等. 土壤连续属性空间插值方法及其精度的研究进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(1): 163-175. Shi Wenjiao, Yue Tianxiang, Shi Xiaoli, et al. Research progress in soil property interpolators and their accuracy[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(1): 163-175(in Chinese with English abstract). [23] Webster R, Oliver M A. Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties[J]. Journal of Soil Science, 1992, 43 (1): 177-192.
[24] Robinson T P, Metternicht G. Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties[J].Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2006, 50(2): 97-108.
[25] 李少华, 刘远刚, 王延忠. 泰森多边形在地质数据去丛聚中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2011, 35(4): 562-564. Li Shaohua, Liu Yuangang, Wang Yanzhong. The application of Thiessen polygon to the declustering effect of geological data[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2011, 35(4): 562-564 (in Chinese with English abstract). [26] Panagopoulos T, Jesus J, Antunes M D C, et al. Analysis of spatial interpolation for optimizing management of a salinized field cultivated with lettuce[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 24(1): 1-10.
[27] Gotway C A, Ferguson R B, Hergert G W, et al. Comparison of Kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1996, 60 (4): 1237-1247.
[28] Weber D, Englund E. Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators[J].Mathematical Geology, 1992, 24(4): 381-391.
[29] Wollenhaupt N C, Wolkowski R P, Clayton M K. Mapping soil test phosphorus and potassium for variable-rate fertilizer application[J].Journal of Production Agriculture, 1994, 7(4) : 441-447.
[30] 林大仪. 土壤学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2005: 366-381. Lin Dayi. Agrology [M]. Beijing: Chinese Forestry Press, 2005: 366-381(in Chinese). -
期刊类型引用(11)
1. 刘新，郝媛媛，花立民. 石羊河下游民勤盆地土壤盐分空间分异特征. 干旱区研究. 2023(10): 1615-1624 . 
百度学术
2. 苟富刚，陆徐荣，龚绪龙，杨露梅，刘明遥. 连云港滨海地区沉积物含盐特征及其对工程基础的影响. 工程地质学报. 2023(06): 2071-2081 . 百度学术
3. 苟富刚，龚绪龙，张岩，杨露梅，刘彦. 长江河口深层软土含盐特征及其沉积环境分析. 海洋学报. 2022(04): 12-22 . 百度学术
4. 王伟，于亮，王志，王伟伟，钮力亚，陆莉，王奉芝，张景俭. 基于计算机模拟的人工盐碱地盐分配方及其应用. 作物研究. 2022(02): 132-137 . 百度学术
5. 苟富刚，龚绪龙，杨露梅，张岩，刘明遥. 长江河口百米以浅土体含盐特征及其沉积环境演化. 现代地质. 2022(02): 462-473 . 百度学术
6. 李进，龚绪龙，刘彦，张岩，苟富刚，刘源. 浅层地下水水化学特征与土体盐分相关性研究. 水资源与水工程学报. 2021(01): 89-96 . 百度学术
7. 王航，周青云，张宝忠，尹林萍. 不同灌水处理下滨海盐碱地土壤-玉米阳离子变化规律及相关关系研究. 灌溉排水学报. 2021(12): 36-43 . 百度学术
8. 王卫星，李攻科，曹淑萍. 天津大港冬枣品质分析及其立地地质背景研究. 山西农业科学. 2019(07): 1230-1234 . 百度学术
9. 苟富刚，龚绪龙，杨磊，张岩，蔡露明. 江苏沿海地区土体含盐特征及指示作用. 长江流域资源与环境. 2018(06): 1380-1387 . 百度学术
10. 毕琳，郭长城，尚云涛，张志罡，宋莉群，朱源山，李媛媛，陈清，王义东，王中良. 天津大黄堡沼泽湿地土壤盐渍化特征及其对长期开垦的响应. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(06): 49-57 . 百度学术
11. 苟富刚，龚绪龙，李进，刘源. 江苏滨海平原微承压水层位水土体含盐特征及其相关性分析. 水资源与水工程学报. 2017(03): 72-76 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 2701
- HTML全文浏览量: 461
- PDF下载量: 4798
- 被引次数: 16
