高级检索
    杨兵. 中国新的矿产资源/储量分类标准与国际主要分类标准的对比研究[J]. 中国地质, 2009, 36(4): 940-947.
    引用本文: 杨兵. 中国新的矿产资源/储量分类标准与国际主要分类标准的对比研究[J]. 中国地质, 2009, 36(4): 940-947.
    YANG Bing. A comparative study of National Standards on Solid Mineral Resources/Reserves Classification and major international classifications[J]. GEOLOGY IN CHINA, 2009, 36(4): 940-947.
    Citation: YANG Bing. A comparative study of National Standards on Solid Mineral Resources/Reserves Classification and major international classifications[J]. GEOLOGY IN CHINA, 2009, 36(4): 940-947.

    中国新的矿产资源/储量分类标准与国际主要分类标准的对比研究

    A comparative study of National Standards on Solid Mineral Resources/Reserves Classification and major international classifications

    • 摘要: 提要:通过对国际上主要的矿产资源储量分类方案的对比研究,对国际上通行的做法与规则进行了归纳。在分析了联合国方案存在的问题与缺陷的基础上,指出了中国新的资源储量分类标准与国际通行规则接轨存在的明显偏差以及在实际使用中存在的问题。最后对中国矿产资源储量分类标准的修订与完善提出了意见。

       

      Abstract: Abstract:Based on a comparative study of major international classification proposals for mineral resources and reserves, this paper sums up current international practice and rules in this aspect. Based on an analysis of the problems and defects of the United Nations Framework Classification for Energy and Mineral Resources, the author points out the deviations of the National Standards on Solid Mineral Resources/Reserves Classification from the internationally recognized practice, with a discussion on the problems encountered during the utilization. Suggestions on the revision and perfection of China's classification standards of mineral resources and reserves are also put forward in this paper.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回