高级检索

    典型干热河谷区生态脆弱性评价—以云南落漏河流域为例

    Assessment of ecological vulnerability in typical hot-dry valley regions: A case study of the Luolou River Basin in Yunnan

    • 摘要:
      研究目的 干热河谷区人地矛盾突出、人-地-生平衡关系不明,随着近年来河谷特色水果产品产业的大力发展,人地互馈作用大幅度增强,在全球极端气候频发的叠加影响下,生态风险将可能进一步加剧,生态系统服务功能受到显著影响。本文通过对干热河谷区落漏河流域生态脆弱性的深入评价,旨在为当地生态环境保护和可持续发展提供科学依据。
      研究方法 基于自然因素和人为因素构建落漏河流域生态环境脆弱性的评价指标体系,采用层次分析法(AHP)和熵权法(EWM)确定指标权重综合评价该区生态环境脆弱性,基于地理探测器(GeoDetector)分析驱动因子。
      研究结果 (1)落漏河流域生态脆弱性以中度脆弱为主,达到253.14km2、占35.18%;其次为轻度脆弱及重度脆弱,面积分别为138.58 km2、132.84 km2,分别占19.26%、18.46%,极度脆弱最少,面积分别为83.48 km2,占11.6%。轻度以下脆弱等级占总面积的34.76%,其中微度脆弱15.5%;重度及以上脆弱等级占30.06%。(2)土地利用类型(X4)及土壤厚度(X9)是落漏河流域生态脆弱性的关键驱动因子,q值分别为0.676和0.53。(3)将落漏河流域划分为5个生态脆弱性分区,分别是鸡足山生态微度脆弱区(Ⅰ)、马耳山生态轻度脆弱区(Ⅱ)、灰窑-奇峰-米筛罗-上大坪生态中度脆弱区(Ⅲ)、西邑-北衙-新城坪生态重度脆弱区((Ⅳ)、王营-大雷钵寺-下大坪-石洞生态极度脆弱区(Ⅴ);在分析总结各个分区主要生态环境问题的基础上,提出了科学合理的生态保护与修复对策建议。
      结论 落漏河流域生态脆弱性以中度脆弱为主,区域整体生态系统较不稳定,抗干扰能力较差,重度脆弱以上区域主要分布于北衙-黄坪-新城-下大坪及鲁车-新城-下大坪一带的河谷两侧海拔2000 m以下地区,该区域生态环境脆弱性是人为活动和自然因素共同驱动作用的结果。

       

      Abstract:
      This paper is the result of environmental geological survey engineering.
      Objective In dry-hot valley areas, the human-environment conflict is prominent and the relationship between humans, land, and ecological balance remains unclear. In recent years, with the vigorous development of the specialty fruit industry in the valley, the mutual feedback between human activities and the environment has been significantly intensified. Under the combined impacts of frequent global extreme weather events, ecological risks may further escalate, and ecosystem services are likely to be severely affected. This study aims to provide a scientific basis for local ecological environmental protection and sustainable development through an in-depth assessment of ecological vulnerability in the Luolou River Basin, a typical dry-hot valley area.
      Methods An evaluation index system for the ecological vulnerability of the Luolou River Basin was constructed based on natural and anthropogenic factors. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Entropy Weight Method (EWM) were combined to integrate subjective and objective weights, thereby determining the index weights for the comprehensive assessment of ecological vulnerability in the study area. Additionally, the GeoDetector model was employed to analyze the driving factors of ecological vulnerability.
      Results (1) The ecological vulnerability of the Luolou River Basin is mainly at a moderate level, covering an area of 253.14 km2, accounting for 35.18% of the total basin area. This is followed by slightly vulnerable and severely vulnerable areas, with areas of 138.58 km2 and 132.84 km2, accounting for 19.26% and 18.46% of the total area, respectively. The extremely vulnerable area is the smallest, with an area of 83.48 km2 (11.6% of the total area). Areas with vulnerability below the slight level account for 34.76% of the total area, among which the minimally vulnerable area accounts for 15.5%. Areas with severe vulnerability and above account for 30.06% of the total area. (2) Land use type (X4) and soil thickness (X9) are the key driving factors affecting the ecological vulnerability of the Luolou River Basin, with q-values of 0.676 and 0.53, respectively. (3) The Luolou River Basin is divided into five ecological vulnerability zones: Jizushan Minimally Vulnerable Zone (Ⅰ), Ma'ershan Slightly Vulnerable Zone (Ⅱ), Huiyao-Qifeng-Mishailuo-Shangdaping Moderately Vulnerable Zone (Ⅲ), Xiyi-Beiya-Xinchengping Severely Vulnerable Zone (Ⅳ), and Wangying-Daleibo Temple-Xiadaping-Shidong Extremely Vulnerable Zone (Ⅴ). Based on the analysis and summary of the main ecological and environmental problems in each zone, scientifically sound and feasible ecological protection and restoration strategies are proposed.
      Conclusions The ecological vulnerability of the Luolou River Basin is dominated by the moderate level, indicating that the overall ecosystem of the region is relatively unstable and has poor disturbance resistance. Areas with severe vulnerability and above are mainly distributed on both sides of the river valleys in regions such as Beiya-Huangping-Xincheng-Xiadaping and Luche-Xincheng-Xiadaping, especially in areas with an elevation below 2000 meters. The ecological vulnerability in this region is the result of the combined effects of human activities and natural factors.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回