高级检索
    王宇林, 姚毅, 张呈彬, 赵承佑, 陆胜, 赵博, 王楚杰. 辽西九佛堂组建组剖面的地层划分及相关问题[J]. 中国地质, 2013, 40(5): 1523-1530.
    引用本文: 王宇林, 姚毅, 张呈彬, 赵承佑, 陆胜, 赵博, 王楚杰. 辽西九佛堂组建组剖面的地层划分及相关问题[J]. 中国地质, 2013, 40(5): 1523-1530.
    WANG Yu-lin, YAO Yi, ZHANG Cheng-bin, ZHAO Cheng-you, LU Sheng, ZHAO Bo, WANG Chu-jie. Stratigraphic division of the Jiufotang Formation in Kazuo Basin of western Liaoning and related issues[J]. GEOLOGY IN CHINA, 2013, 40(5): 1523-1530.
    Citation: WANG Yu-lin, YAO Yi, ZHANG Cheng-bin, ZHAO Cheng-you, LU Sheng, ZHAO Bo, WANG Chu-jie. Stratigraphic division of the Jiufotang Formation in Kazuo Basin of western Liaoning and related issues[J]. GEOLOGY IN CHINA, 2013, 40(5): 1523-1530.

    辽西九佛堂组建组剖面的地层划分及相关问题

    Stratigraphic division of the Jiufotang Formation in Kazuo Basin of western Liaoning and related issues

    • 摘要: 提要:针对辽西九佛堂组目前的多种划分方案及相关问题,通过对位于小孤山—旧烧锅的九佛堂组建组剖面的重新测量,在兼顾岩相组合和喀左盆地九佛堂组其他剖面沉积特征的基础上,以凝灰质岩石组合作为标志层组,将九佛堂组建组剖面划分为一、二、三、四段。比较详细地阐述了该剖面九佛堂组以粉砂岩、泥质岩为主,其间夹众多极薄层状灰岩或泥灰岩;自下而上具有滨浅湖相、深湖相夹浅湖相、浅湖相的沉积演化特征。小孤山—旧烧锅剖面与九佛堂组其他剖面的差异性表现在碎屑岩的粒度总体较细,未见湖泊三角洲相和扇三角洲相;在二段下部发育3层中、薄层状硅化凝灰岩;九佛堂组建组剖面未出露九佛堂组四段上部和五段。为全面认识九佛堂组,建议在建组剖面的基础上引入辅助剖面,并推荐回民沟—平房东沟剖面、付杖子—烧锅街剖面或张麻子沟—桃花池剖面分别作为九佛堂组一段、四至五段的辅助剖面。

       

      Abstract: Abstract:According to the present various division schemes and related issues for Jiufotang Formation in western Liaoning, the authors remeasured the type section of Jiufotang Formation in Xiaogushan-Jiushaoguo. In consideration of the lithofacies and sedimentary characteristics of other sections in Jiufotang Formation of Kazuo basin, the authors chose the tuffaceous rock association as the marker bed or the bed set and, on such a basis, divided the type section of Jiufotang Formation into four members called 1, 2, 3, 4 respectively. The authors found that the Jiufotang Formation is mainly composed of siltstone and pelite, intercalated with numerous extremely tiny layered limestone or marl, characterized by the upward sedimentary evolution from shore shallow lake facies through deep lake facies intercalated with shallow lake facies to shallow lake facies. The differences between Xiaogushan-Jiushaoguo section and other sections in Jiufotang Formation indicate that the clastic rock granularity of Xiaogushan-Jiushaogou section was finer in general, without the development of delta facies and fan delta facies. In addition, three beds of moderate and thin silicified tuff are developed at the bottom of member 2, and the type section of Jiufotang Formation fails to appear at the top of member 4 and member 5. To comprehensively understand Jiufotang Formation, the authors propose that the auxiliary sections should be introduced on the basis of the type section, and Huimingou-Pingfangdonggou section, Fuzhangzi-Shaoguojie section and Zhangmazigou-Taohuachi section can serve as the auxiliary sections of member 1, member 4 and member 5 of Jiufotang Formation respectively.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回