滇东典型煤矿区土壤重金属生态风险及来源解析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国地质调查局昆明自然资源综合调查中心;2.中国地质大学北京水资源与环境学院;3.中国地质调查局昆明自然资源综合调查中心、自然资源部自然生态系统碳汇工程技术中心;4.云南大学生态与环境学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中国地质调查局项目(DD20208075)


Ecological Risk and Source Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in Typical Coal Mining Areas of Eastern Yunnan Province
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Kunming General Survey of Natural Resources Center, China Geological Survey、Technology Innovation Center for Natural Ecosystem Carbon Sink, Ministry of Natural Resources;2.School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing);3.College of Ecology and Environment, Yunnan University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    提要:【研究目的】研究区地处滇东重要煤炭和农业产区,弄清煤矿区土壤重金属空间分布特征、潜在生态风险和污染来源,对煤矿区生态环境保护治理和确保农业安全具有重要现实意义。【研究方法】基于网格布点法于2021年6月在典型煤矿区采集土壤样品497件,分析了土壤pH、SOM、As、Cd、Cr、Cu、Hg、Ni、Pb和Zn,运用污染负荷指数法和潜在生态风险指数法对重金属污染状况和潜在生态风险进行评价,通过主成分分析和正定矩阵因子分析(PMF)模型分析了重金属潜在来源。【研究结果】土壤pH平均值为5.39,以酸性为主,SOM含量平均值是云南省土壤背景值的12.00倍,Cr、Cu、Cd、Ni、Zn和Hg含量平均值和中位数均超过云南省土壤背景值,绝大部分采样点Cd、Cu、Cr、Ni含量超过风险筛选值,分别占94.97%、93.96%、91.35%、79.28%,少部分采样点As、Cd含量超管制值,分别占0.20%、1.41%。污染负荷指数法评价结果显示,研究区整体呈现轻微污染。潜在生态风险指数法评价结果显示,研究区整体呈现中等风险。主成分分析和PMF模型解析结果显示,研究区土壤重金属主要来源于地质背景,其次为农业活动和大气沉降。【结论】煤矿区土壤中Cd、Hg潜在生态风险较高,土壤重金属主要来源于地质背景,其次是农业活动和大气沉降,建议加强相关污染土地的监测和管理,减少农家肥不合理施用,强化煤炭工业活动污染监管。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: This paper is result of geological survey engineering. 【Objective】The study area is located in an important coal and agricultural production area in eastern Yunnan Province. It is of great practical significance to understand the spatial distribution characteristics, potential ecological risks and pollution sources of heavy metals in soil of coal mining area for ecological environment protection and ensure agricultural security.【Methods】497 soil samples collected in June 2017 in a typical coal mining area based on the grid placement method, and Soil pH, SOM, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn were analyzed. Pollution load index method and potential ecological risk index method were used to evaluate heavy metal pollution status and potential ecological risk. The potential sources of heavy metals were analyzed by principal component analysis and positive definite matrix factor analysis.【Results】The mean of soil pH is 5.39, mainly acidic, and the mean of SOM content is 12.00 times higher than the background value for soils in Yunnan Province. The mean and median of Cr, Cu, Cd, Ni, Zn and Hg are all higher than the soil background value of Yunnan Province, the majority of sampling points Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni content exceeds the risk screening value, accounted for 94.97%, 93.96%, 91.35%, 79.28%, and a small number of sampling points exceeds the control values for As and Cd, accounting for 0.20% and 1.41% respectively. The results of the Pollution Load Index method of evaluation show that the study area as a whole shows slight pollution. The results of the evaluation of the potential ecological risk index method show that the study area as a whole presents a medium risk. The results of the principal component analysis and the PMF model analysis show that soil heavy metals in the study area are mainly derived from the geological background, followed by agricultural activities and atmospheric deposition.【Conclusion】 The potential ecological risk of Cd and Hg in the soil of the coal mining area is high, and the soil heavy metals mainly derived from the geological background, followed by agricultural activities and atmospheric deposition. It is suggested to strengthen the monitoring and management of related polluted land, reduce the unreasonable application of farmyard manure, and strengthen the supervision of pollution from coal industry activities.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-28
  • 最后修改日期:2023-03-24
  • 录用日期:2023-05-14
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
温馨提示:建议您使用Chrome、火狐、IE最新版本 ,当您的浏览器版本过低,可能会影响部分功能正常使用。
关闭