• The Core Journal of China
  • Included in Chinese Science Citation Database
  • The Key Magazine of China technology
  • Frontrunner 5000—Top Articles in Outstanding S&T Journals of China
  • Included in Scopus
  • Included in Chemical Abstracts (CA)
  • Included in Russian Abstract Journal (AJ)
Advanced Search
ZHANG Yi-ping, XIAO Wen-xia, ZHANG Jin, CHEN Xuan-hua, ZHANG Bei-hang, ZHAO Heng, WANG Yan-nan, LI Jiang-yu, SHI Jian-jie. A discussion on the provenance and age of Xiangshan Group in Eastern Hexi Corridor[J]. GEOLOGY IN CHINA, 2015, 42(6): 1774-1774.
Citation: ZHANG Yi-ping, XIAO Wen-xia, ZHANG Jin, CHEN Xuan-hua, ZHANG Bei-hang, ZHAO Heng, WANG Yan-nan, LI Jiang-yu, SHI Jian-jie. A discussion on the provenance and age of Xiangshan Group in Eastern Hexi Corridor[J]. GEOLOGY IN CHINA, 2015, 42(6): 1774-1774.

A discussion on the provenance and age of Xiangshan Group in Eastern Hexi Corridor

More Information
  • Abstract: The Xiangshan Group is composed of a set of marine clastic rocks with small amounts of limestone and siliceous rocks, which experienced the greenshist facies metamorphism, and is located mainly in the eastern Hexi Corridor. The comparison between the detrital zircon ages (LA-ICP-MS) of the Xiangshan Group and the Miboshan Formation shows that the youngest zircon (451±8) Ma of Miboshan Formation is younger than the youngest (525±3) Ma of the Xiangshan Group, and Xiangshan Group does not contain other young zircons as the Miboshan Formation. Therefore, the age of Xiangshan Group should be younger than (525±3) Ma and older than the Ordovician Miboshan Formation. The Xiangshan Group may be the Middle-Late Cambrian in age. Furthermore, the striking comparison between detrital zircon ages of the Xiangshan Group with the ages of magmatic and/or metamorphic events of southwest Australia, Cathsysia Block, the basement of Alxa Block, the western margin of North China Block, and the North Qilian Orgenic Belt shows that the possibility of Cathsysia Block, the basement of Alxa Block, the western margin of North China Block, and the North Qilian Orgenic Belt as the provenance of Xiangshan Group should be ruled out. Combined with paleocurrent data of the Xiangshan Group, the authods argue that the southwestern Australia might have been the main provenance of the Xiangshan Group.

Catalog

    Article views (3468) PDF downloads (3176) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return